opinions reliability performance wheel loader caterpillar IT series
its a cat ,of cause its ok, if it isn't you have the best support available mark
I just wanted to know what you think of the series EN, or if recommended another type of machine we will also use it with forks type forklift, what do you think that defects have real performance advantages do you advise, thanks excuse me if I posed the question wrong and I was not clear
My only caution is to avoid the mono tube that is sometimes found on the 924G as pictured. Often times tremendous torque is exerted on the loader frame when using the corner of your bucket. The arms seem to offer more resistance to cracks from over torque. Also, around here the resale is much lower for the mono tube types than the conventional design.
Il mio era Dubbio infatti la forma del braccio, la Casella di tipo escavatore, Che tipo di consiglio di Portare armi per Gli Sforzi Migliori, grazie Question What do you think of the box-arm 988h type excavator boom, too weak to efforts to twisting, better conventional Z?
Caterpillar interrotto il braccio scatola qualche tempo fa. Che combinati con i rapporti sfavorevoli che ho sentito e qualche esperienza personale mi dice che sarebbe rimasto con la disposizione convenzionale Z che ha lavorato per anni. Caterpillar discontinued the box arm sometime ago. That combined with unfavorable reports I have heard and some personal experience tells me I would stay with the conventional Z arrangement that has worked for years.
grazie per il chiarimento, si dovrebbe avere un piccolo porta-attrezzi, forchette benna per il braccio carrello elevatore con il tipo di gancio della gru, quale auto suggeriresti come alternativa a questo modello, come macchine di servizio tutti fare affari? rispetto al braccio se non ricordo male nei nuovi modelli introdotti un braccio che lavora per scavare tipo twill z tipo rocker con comò, e un tipo di Volvo coppia in parallelo, per portautensili, ho ragione?
Sorry that is not 100% correct. The 2 models with the box boom were/are the 988 & the 992. The 992 was first given a box boom when the 992G replaced the 992D in 1997. Initially the box boom was a single-piece cast steel component. When the 992G was replaced by the 992K the boom became a combination of castings and steel fabrications but it is still a box structure, and will continue to be so for the foreseeable future AFAIK. http://www.cat.com/en_US/products/new/equipment/wheel-loaders/large-wheel-loaders/18266768.html The 988 was first given a box boom when the 988G replaced the 988F Series II around 1999. The box boom was always a fabricated structure reinforced with castings. The exact same Part Number of boom was continued when the 988H replaced the 988G somewhere around 2005. When the next new model (988K) was released in mid-2013 the box boom was replaced by a "conventional" H-frame. http://www.cat.com/en_MX/products/new/equipment/wheel-loaders/large-wheel-loaders/17770689.html http://www.cat.com/en_US/products/new/equipment/wheel-loaders/large-wheel-loaders/18438276.html
grazie per il chiarimento, secondo te cosa c'è di meglio bracci conformazione, più robusto e meno usura manutenzione grazie