Heavy Equipment Forums Heavy Equipment Community

Old Twin Turbo 855

Birken Vogt · 2023-02-10 01:29

What is this thing? No idea they made one back in the old days.

Replies13
  1. #1Coaldust2023-02-10 03:00

    It’s beautiful!

  2. #2Vetech632023-02-10 07:30

    Much simpler times.

  3. #356wrench2023-02-10 09:52

    If i remember correctly they were known as a twin turbo 475. My cousin had one in a western star. A little more grunt than a 400

  4. #4kshansen2023-02-10 10:04

    I kind of recall hearing about them but never saw one in person. Wonder what the application for this one was as it does not have an air compressor so probably not a truck. Maybe a genset or some kind of pump?

  5. #5Welder Dave2023-02-11 00:44

    Is it common to run an engine just sitting on blocks?

  6. #6Steve Frazier2023-02-11 09:39

    A buddy of mine had a 4300 Series IH in the 80s that had a twin turbo Cummins, he said it was a 444.

  7. #7mekanik2023-02-11 10:58

    That engine does not have the MVT or mechanical variable timing system that was on the Cummins 475. The MVT was an electrically controlled air cylinder that rotated the cam follower shafts to operate eccentrics inside the injector cam followers to advance and retard the timing.Until Cummins came out with the NTC444 the NTC475 was the worst engine that Cummins ever built.

  8. #8Greatwestcam2023-02-12 00:15

    I remember one of the local log haulers put one in a HDX, the driver was hoping for good things from the engine and was totally pissed of with it in a short time. said there was no bottom end torque, was hard to lift off with a load, and that the old ntc 400 would out pull it.

  9. #9kshansen2023-02-12 06:58

    Hard to get a good view of it with the "camera" moving around so much but think it might have been bolted to the block/cribbing.

  10. #10Truck Shop2023-02-12 07:54

    Should posted under Trucks. That is a oddball stationary-Cummins built a few very few. The MVT 475 twin turbo like Mekanik says was one of Cummins biggest piles, I worked on a lot. Keeping the MVT operating smoothly was a issue, real problem was the amount of BOOST. Those engines would hit 50 lbs in nothing flat. It was a head bolt breaking, block distorting piece of crap. Keeping head gaskets in one was a challenge-that wasn't going to materialize. The 855 Block was not designed for that kind of pressure. Those were built in between BCI and BCII series. Main and rod bearings took a beating. So when someone starts talking about how glorious the 475's were they never owned one or worked on one. Most all had the MVT removed and turned down to single turbo, at least the smart ones did. One of Cummins biggest disasters.

  11. #11Old Doug2023-02-12 08:45

    That 75 extra would make be great . We started a 400 setting the pan and a block i wanted to chain it to the forklift mast but the boss thought it would take to much time. It didnt move any i was surprised and it was wide open at first.

  12. #12Pops522023-02-12 13:32

    The video of the 475 TT reminded me of this engine I acquired several years and then sold to a guy in Oregon. Hope the video works. 1964 NHRS 320 with oil cooled pistons. Originally came with a blower but at some time someone put a T-50 on it. CUMMINS NHRS320 - YouTube

  13. #13Truck Shop2023-02-12 13:47

    And to further elaborate-the whole idea of Cummins crazy MVT twin turbo mess was to fulfill California's 1980 CARB compliant program. So I laugh when people think the stuff we have today is a problem. Cummins built that 475 pile to meet emissions 44 years ago, long before most members on here were born. The STC system was born from the MTV. Cummins built so many oddball engines, all one has to do is look up how many CPL's for a given year will tell you that. Cummins took their underwear off threw at the wall and it didn't stick it slid straight down with this design. Below is a data tag from a typical Cummins oddball, note the build date, 1995. A BCIII only used in a few stationary units.